PromptKey
Log in
← Back to market
coding

Staff-level code review copilot

No ratings yet

β‚Ή99

Reviews a diff the way a good staff engineer does: correctness bugs first, each with a concrete failing input, then genuine simplifications with line counts. Refuses to waste your time on style nits.

Preview

Review this diff as a staff engineer. Rank findings by severity. Every correctness claim must come with a concrete input or state that triggers the failure…

β€” sample output β€”
"CRITICAL β€” `parseWindow()` returns NaN when `end < start`, which silently zeroes the rate limit. Failing input: {start: 100, end: 50}…"

2 model-tuned variants inside

Claude Sonnet 4.5 Β· GPT-5

Sign in to buy β†’

Ratings

Only buyers and subscribers can rate.